In the past ten months, numerous drivers in New Orleans have been fined for speeding in school zones. However, a recent development may lead to refunds for those who paid these fines. State Senator Stewart Cathey has raised concerns about the legality of the city's speed cameras due to the absence of a cooperative endeavor agreement (CEA) with local school systems, as mandated by state law. Since the cameras were activated without such an agreement, there is now a push to return funds collected from these fines, amounting to over $2 million.
Since last fall, New Orleans has employed speed cameras in school zones, issuing thousands of tickets and collecting substantial fines. Despite a state law passed in 2024 requiring the Cantrell administration to establish a CEA detailing how the collected funds would be distributed, the city proceeded without this agreement. According to Senator Cathey, any money collected since August 1st could be deemed improperly gathered, thus necessitating refunds. This issue gained traction when the city announced a belated deal with Orleans Parish Public Schools, yet agreements with private and Catholic schools remain unresolved.
Sensor activation in school zones typically requires meticulous planning and adherence to legal protocols. In this case, the lack of a formal agreement before deploying the cameras has sparked significant debate. Cathey, who authored the legislation mandating CEAs, insists that retroactively signing such agreements does not align with the law. Consequently, he advocates for refunding ticket payments made during this period, emphasizing the importance of compliance with existing regulations.
Beyond refunds, Cathey introduced Senate Bill 99, empowering the state attorney general to hold officials accountable for activating cameras without proper agreements. The bill swiftly advanced through legislative chambers and awaits the governor’s signature. If enacted, it would reinforce the necessity of CEAs, potentially affecting future operations of similar systems across Louisiana. Meanwhile, the city remains silent on the matter, though a spokesperson indicates they are formulating a response.
With the potential for substantial financial implications, the situation underscores the significance of legal adherence in municipal initiatives. As discussions continue, the outcome will likely influence both local policy and statewide practices regarding traffic enforcement technology. Drivers affected by these policies eagerly await clarification on their eligibility for refunds while policymakers deliberate on the broader implications of this legal challenge.