Embracing Tradition: The Power of Pen and Paper in the Digital Age
A Return to Basics: Eliminating AI from the Classroom
Chanea Bond, an English teacher at Southwest High School in Fort Worth, has made a decisive move to ban generative AI from her American literature and composition classes. Despite her students having access to school-issued laptops, Bond's classroom is filled with stacks of worksheets, and nearly all assignments are required to be handwritten. This analog method begins each class with journaling in notebooks, emphasizing the use of pen and paper for all tasks.
The Rationale Behind the Analog Method: Cultivating Thought and Expression
Bond's primary motivation for this unconventional approach is to ensure her students develop strong foundational thinking and writing skills without the shortcuts offered by AI. She recounts an unsuccessful experiment where students used AI to write thesis statements for literary analysis, resulting in a lack of genuine engagement with the text. Bond firmly believes that true intellectual growth comes from independent thought and the arduous process of constructing arguments, rather than outsourcing these crucial steps to technology.
The Blueprint of AI-Free Instruction: Fostering Authentic Writing
Bond's AI-free teaching methodology centers on nurturing students' writing voices and building confidence. Daily handwritten journaling provides a low-stakes environment for students to practice expressing their thoughts. Instead of merely grading final products, Bond meticulously assesses each stage of the writing process, from thesis development and outlining to bibliographies and handwritten drafts. This detailed approach ensures that students are actively engaged in critical thinking throughout their assignments, making it less likely for them to resort to AI.
Student Reactions: Initial Skepticism to Enduring Appreciation
Initially, some students, like junior Meyah Alvarez, found Bond's analog requirements perplexing. Alvarez recalls being asked to redo a typed outline by hand, a task she initially resisted but later found beneficial. She now recognizes that Bond's methods actively stimulate her brain and foster deeper engagement with literature. Many students, despite acknowledging the widespread use of AI among peers, support Bond's ban, viewing her class as a valuable opportunity to develop their own ideas rather than relying on AI-generated content.
Lessons Learned: Overcoming the Temptation of AI Shortcuts
Even students who previously succumbed to the temptation of using AI for assignments have learned from their experiences in Bond's class. One junior, identified as T, admitted to using AI for a bibliography due to time constraints. Bond's compassionate but firm response—requiring him to redo the assignment manually—led T to realize the importance of genuine effort and critical thinking over technological shortcuts. He now advises peers to prioritize personal growth and thoughtful engagement in their academic work.
Diverse Educational Approaches: Integrating AI versus Analog Learning
While Bond champions an analog classroom, not all educators share her perspective. Brett Vogelsinger, an English teacher outside Philadelphia and a friend of Bond's, advocates for responsible AI integration. He aims to teach students how to differentiate between using AI as a legitimate learning tool and using it to circumvent intellectual effort. This highlights a broader, ongoing debate within education about the optimal role of AI in fostering student learning.
Varying Institutional Stances: Embracing or Resisting AI in Schools
The debate extends beyond individual educators to educational institutions and governmental bodies. While some districts, such as Miami-Dade County Public Schools, are actively integrating AI tools like Google's Gemini chatbot, others are more cautious. State and federal initiatives also vary, with some promoting AI education through grants and partnerships, while others, like Bond, remain skeptical of its benefits for fundamental skill development. Bond, while open to future changes, believes that prioritizing core thinking and articulation skills without AI currently best serves her students' long-term academic success.